HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOMM - Meeting Minutes - 2-S-96 - 2-15-1996 - SALARYM I N U T E
SALARY BOARD
2E9
WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Minute No. 2-S-96
Office of the County Commissioners
Washington, Pa., February 15,1996
The Washington County Salary Board met in session in the Public Meeting Room of the Courthouse
Square Office Building, Washington, Pennsylvania, at approximately 9:40 a.m. on Thursday, February 15,
1996, with the following members being present: Commissioners Ford, Irey and Burns and Controller
Belcastro. Also being present: Judge Gladden; Francis King, Treasurer; Sam Secreet, Sheriff; Kathleen
Flynn Reda, Register of Wills; Kathy McCullough Testa, Recorder of Deeds; Tina Dallatore, Chief Clerk;
Linda Hands, Clerk -Steno II; Attorney James McCune, Interim Solicitor; Dick Cibella, Director of Employee
Relations; Janice Urban, Assistant Director of Employee Relations; Roger Metcalfe, Budget Director; Duane
Kavka, Acting Director of Administration; Chris Brady, Court Administrator; Stan Rockovich, Chief Adult
Probation Officer; Sue Accetta, DRO Director; Joe Pelzer, Warden; Attorneys Bryan Pizzi, Chris Blackwell,
Phillip Binotto and Peter Suwak; Steve Svitek of the Sheriffs Office; George Stewart, Chairman,
Washington County Republican Committee, Rick Conrady, Chamber of Commerce, Paul Stifflemire of W&J
College; Diane Sanford, LeMoyne Center; Harry Sabatasse, Anthony Turriziani, Rose Sim, Shirley McBride,
Ruth Ann Morris, Bill Haines and Gordon Hanson, concerned citizens; Mary Elizabeth Yancosek of
Washington; Joe Smydo, Observer -Reporter; Chris Haines, Herald Standard; Kathy Thomas, The Valley
Independent; and Jim Jefferson, WJPA.
Chairman Ford stated that this Board of Commissioners has asked for a convening of the Salary Board
in relationship to the adopted budget that reflects reductions accordingly. He stated that in two particular
incidents there seems to be some concern relative to the ability of this Board of Commissioners to convene
this Salary Board. Commissioner Ford asked Attorney Jim McCune, Interim County Solicitor, to address
these concerns.
Attorney Jim McCune stated that the opinion that he has is that the Board can convene this Salary
Board meeting. He stated that as far as the judicial employees are concerned, the new budget has been
adopted which contains certain cuts in the court -related offices and the Solicitor and Commissioners agree
that President Judge Gladden and the Board of Judges will make those cuts inside the court -related offices
as the Board of Judges determines. He noted that judge Gladden is aware of that and that is the way the
cuts in the judicial related offices will be accomplished. He stated that as far as the remaining offices are
concerned, the opinion that he has says that the Salary Board can convene and conduct business on those
offices.
(judge Gladden entered the meeting.)
Chairman Ford asked Judge Gladden to come up to the Salary Board table. Judge Gladden declined.
Attorney Jim McCune repeated the statement which he made above for the benefit of Judge Gladden.
-MINUTE BOOK
SALARY BOARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Judge Gladden asked if he could understand that to mean that Board of County Commissioners has
recognized that the Court of Common Pleas is a separate branch of county government and that the Courts
have the right to hire, fire and supervise their employees. He stated that the Courts defer to the County
Commissioners in setting a budget which will give the Courts money to reasonably operate the Courts and
the Courts defer to legally constituted Salary Boards to set the number of their employees and their salaries.
Attorney Jim McCune stated that he would agree that the Judges have the right to hire, fire and
supervise employees within the court -related offices; obviously, however, the Courts have to live within the
budget that has been constituted and accepted.
Judge Gladden stated that his position this morning as far as the Salary Board is concerned is that
these matters have been acted on at the January meeting and that he will consider the budget adjustments
and that the Courts will make the a,,,� r ..'.ate cuts in employment if that becomes essential.
Attorney Phillip Binotto asked if the Courts are permitted with the Board's consent to tell the two
employees that received layoff notices that those notices are ineffective. Chairman Ford stated that that was
accurate. He further stated again that the Board of Commissioners will monitor the Court's spending and
reserves the right if that spending is exceeded to stop and defend the Courts accordingly until the budget is
held to accordingly. Judge Gladden stated that he could guarantee that the budget would be lived within as
it always has been and that the Courts will give $1.50 for every $1.00 they get.
(Judge Gladden left the meeting.)
Chairman Ford stated that it is now clear that from the Solicitor's legal opinion that the Board has the
ability to convene the Salary Board as it relates to the Row Offices.
4197 - SHERIFF
Chairman Ford asked Sheriff Sam Secreet if he wished to come forward. There was no response from
Sheriff Sam Secreet.
Attorney Christopher Blackwell, Solicitor for the Sheriff, stated that he understands the Board's
position as stated by Chairman Ford and Attorney McCune; however, it is the Sheriffs position as well as
the position of the other Row Officers that this meeting of the Salary Board can not convene; that there is no
authority for the Board to convene this meeting and that this meeting can only take place at the request of
the actual Row Officer. As such, the Sheriff does not recognize this meeting of the Salary Board as a legal
meeting and that any decision resulting from it would be annulled.
At the request of Attorney Jim McCune, Attorney Blackwell cited the case of Simon v. Allegheny
County, a Supreme Court decision, and read the following paragraph which he felt was quite appropriate:
"The law is clear that a meeting of the Salary Board to fix the number or
compensation of the employees of any county office must be a meeting
called by the administrative head of the office to be affected. As the court
below aptly said: 'Without this limitation any Board of County Commissioners
OQ
401
MINUTE
SALARY BOARD
B❑❑K
WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
would occupy a dominant czar -like position in the control of the county's
business and would be in a position to dominate or control each and every
elected public official and each and every county officer, .. ' ".
Attorney McCune asked if that addressed a situation where a budget has been amended. Attorney
Blackwell stated that he does not believe that it addresses a situation where a budget has been amended, but
he feels it addresses the situation where the Salary Board has already convened, and that meeting has been
adjourned and the number of positions has been set and err. ,, ed by the Salary Board. He further stated
that it will be the Sheriffs position that the Commissioners can not amend the budget through the Salary
Board. He stated he feels that the Commissioners may tell a Row Officer, and in this particular case, the
Sheriff, that the Commissioners are decreasing his budget by a certain amount of money, and it is up to the
Sheriff to live within the confines of the new budget. He stated that it is the Sheriffs position that the
Commisisoners can not tell the Sheriff specifically to lay off a certain employee, which has already occurred.
Moved by Mrs. Irey, seconded by Mr. Ford, to ABOLISH a position of Lieutenant in the Sheriffs
Department.
Roll call vote taken:
Mr. Secreet - Did not participate; Mr. Belcastro - No;
Mr. Burns - No; Mrs. Irey - Yes; Mr. Ford - Yes.
Motion did not carry.
Chairman Ford requested Attorney McCune to give an explanation to Commissioner Burns as it
relates to the adopted budget and the action taken forward here today by the Salary Board. Attorney
McCune stated that the budget has been passed, the spending cuts have been effectuated and they effect
certain identified offices. These offices and the county government in general. is going to have to get
underneath that budget ceiling in some fashion. It is a pay me now or pay me later type of situation. If
some type of savings is not effectuated now in terms of reduction of number of employees or some other
way, then this issue is going to be faced in November or December in some way with offices having to
reduce services or close during certain days of the week, in other words not give services to the public as
required to do. It is a policy decision; it is a governmental decision that this Board has to make. The
savings that are being attempted here today are to prevent, more drastic measures that might occur before the
end of the year.
Chairman Ford stated that obviously Commissioner Burns has a right to vote whichever way he
wishes. He asked Attorney McCune if there is legal standing as to the fact that because Commissioner
Burns voted to adopt the amended budget that he coincide with this arrangement. Attorney McCune stated
that the budget has been passed and the savings is going to have to be realized; if they are not realized in
terms of savings in reduction of workforce, then they are going to have to be realized in some other way
sooner or later. The county government has an obligation to provide the services that the Row Offices and
the other county departments provide and this Board has to decide the best way to get inside the budget.
282
SALARY BOARD
MINUTE BOOK
WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Chairman Ford stated for clarification purposes that the reason for the reduction of personnel is to
keep the respective departments within the budget that has been adopted and that simply means that if the
lay-offs do not occur and the departments go over budget, this Board of Commissioners will then be faced to
defend those particular departmental budgets, and if that is reducing the offices to 4 or 3 days a week, that
is something that will be adjusted at the end of the year as opposed to adjusting it now.
4153 Recorder of Deeds
Chairman Ford asked Kathy McCullough Testa, Recorder of Deeds, if she wished to come forward.
Mrs. McCullough Testa responded "No" and stated that based on the advice of her solicitor and also
based on what the Sheriffs solicitor stated, she was not going to participate in this meeting.
Moved by Mr. Ford, seconded by Mrs. Irey, to ABOLISH a position of Clerk Typist II in the Recorder
of Deeds Office.
Roll call vote taken:
Mrs. McCullough -Testa - Did not participate; Mr. Belcastro - No; Mr. Burns - No;
Mrs. Irey - Yes; Mr. Ford - Yes.
Motion did not carry.
4196 - Register of Wills
Kathleen Flynn Reda, Register of Wills, made the following statement for the record:
"I have an honest disagreement with the fact that the agenda for this meeting attempts to reopen the
matters that were settled at the reorganization meeting held on January 2,1996. At that meeting the Board
decided that all salaries should remain as in the previous year. The agenda today calls for new action on
personnel. I don't believe this is permitted after an adjourned reorganization meeting under the County
Code. Furthermore, without reasonable consultation with my office and without reasonable opportunity to
investigate and offer alternatives to the directive of the Commissioners that Carol Rozzo in my office be
fired, the Board of Commissioners seems intent on proceeding. I submit to you that this is arbitrary and
may also be unlawful and I will not be participating in this meeting."
Moved by Mr. Ford, seconded by Mrs. Irey, to ABOLISH a position of Clerk Typist II in the Register
of Wills Department.
Roll call vote taken:
Ms. Flynn -Reds - Did not participate; Mr. Belcastro - No; Mr. Burns - No;
Mrs. Irey - Yes; Mr. Ford - Yes.
Motion did not carry.
4139 - Treasurer
Attorney Bryan Pizzi, Solicitor for the Treasurer, stated that not to belabor the point, Attorney
Blackwell eloquently stated the Treasurer's position and he has advised Francis King, Treasurer,
not to participate.
6103
40
MINUTE BOOK
SALARY BOARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Moved by Mr. Ford, seconded by Mrs. Irey, to ABOLISH a position of Cashier II in the Treasurer's
Office, contingent upon the position not being abolished until April 30th due to the expectant tax payments
that will be coming in.
Roll call vote taken:
Mr. King - Did not participate; Mr. Belcastro - No; Mr. Burns - No;
Mrs. Irey - Yes; Mr. Ford - Yes.
Motion did not carry.
42321- TAIL
Moved by Mr. Belcastm, seconded by Mr. Ford, to CREATE one Captain position for the new
correctional facility.
Roll call vote taken:
Mr. Belcastro - Yes; Mr. Burns - Yes;
Mrs. Irey - Yes; Mr. Ford - Yes.
Motion carried unanimously.
42322 - TAIL
Moved by Mr. Belcastro, seconded by Mr. Burns, to CREATE nine (9) positions of Correctional Officer
I for the new correctional facility.
Roll call vote taken:
Mr. Belcastro - Yes; Mr. Burns - Yes; '
Mrs. Irey - Yes; Mr. Ford - Yes.
Motion carried unanimously.
42961- HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Moved by Mr. Belcastro, seconded by Mr. Ford, to CREATE two (2) per diem slots for Hazardous
Materials at 7.5 hrs./day; County received a grant of $37,300.00 of which the funds are to be expended by
June 30,1996.
Roll call vote taken:
Mr. Belcastro - Yes; Mr. Burns - Yes;
Mrs. Irey - Yes; Mr. Ford - Yes.
Motion carried unanimously.
The following items are noted for the record only:
41785 - PARKS
Philip Muskovich, Utility Worker, layoff 2/29/96
446154 - HEALTH CENTER
Keith Sim, Asst. Maintenance Director, layoff 2129/96
4138 - TAX CLAIM
Cheryl Allen, Clerk Typist I, temporary employee, layoff 2129/96
MINUTE BOOK
SALARY BOARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
42322 - TAIL
John Corwin, Counselor, layoff 2/29/96
Nancy Ellis, Counselor, layoff 2/29/96
41986 - DRUG UNIT
Richard Kara, Detective, 60% of salary to come from Drug Task Force
41421- PURCHASING
Karen Barbao, Clerk I, part-time employee, layoff 2/29/96
There being no further business, Chairman Ford declared the meeting adjourned at approximately
9:55 a.m.
THE FOR GOING MINUTES SUBIV.Lt i i mi FOR APPROVAL:
-- , ,1996
ATTEST:
CHIEF CLERK
1